Metavert Meditations

Share this post

Comparing Economies in Virtual Worlds

meditations.metavert.io

Discover more from Metavert Meditations

The next-generation of the internet, driven by creativity, connection and real-time interaction: immersive experience, games, AI, virtual worlds and the metaverse.
Over 1,000 subscribers
Continue reading
Sign in

Comparing Economies in Virtual Worlds

Economies in virtual worlds have a large number of distinguishing characteristics. This ontology attempts to describe them in terms of two…

Jon Radoff
Feb 10, 2022
Share this post

Comparing Economies in Virtual Worlds

meditations.metavert.io
Share

Economies in virtual worlds have a large number of distinguishing characteristics. This ontology attempts to describe them in terms of two of the important ones: an open <-> closed axis, and an externalized <-> internalized axis — and then place a number of worlds into this structure.

Open vs. Closed

An open economy is one in which creators other than the original world (or platform) can contribute back to the world’s ecosystem in some meaningful way.

A closed economy is one in which the ability to create is largely constrained to the original platform’s creator.

Internalized vs. Externalized

An internalized economy is one in which all of the economic activity takes places within the platform itself — there’s no significant interoperability that enables the exchange of creativity beyond the confines of the original world.

An externalized economy is where economic activity is possible beyond the original platform, or between platforms.

Classifications

Using this structure, we can describe a few of the types of economies that exist.

Open-Externalized: “Sandboxes”

These are systems in which creators can fork the original platforms, make their own versions, create content within them, share them with other people, and create bridges between worlds and/or avatar systems.

Open-Internalized: “Walled Gardens”

These are worlds in which you can create new content, worlds, experiences — and the economy (such as currency systems, rules, purchasing) is controlled by the platform’s creator.

Closed-Internalized: “Theme Parks”

These are worlds in which the creativity is largely constrained to what you can do within the world as a player (e.g., customize your character, livestream your gameplay, or modify the user interface).

Closed-Externalized: “Mashup Ecosystems”

This is where the a creator defines the building blocks (characters, setting, etc.), and an ecosystem of fans emerges that reworks the content in new ways.

Other Methods of Comparing

There are a few other ways we could compare virtual world economies and many of the “metaverse” type things people are talking about. Here are a couple of others I considered (and I may map these out in the future):

  • Whether the economy is focused around items/avatars/ownership vs. the crafting of experiences/games

  • Whether the economy is oriented around intrinsic rewards, vs. financialized through extrinsic rewards

Further Reading

  • Game Economics Part 1, The Attention Economy starts a 3-part series on the way games are monetized.

  • Metaverse Interoperability, Part 1: Challenges starts a series focused on some of the complex issues that surface as you build within the externalized<->open sector of this map.

Share this post

Comparing Economies in Virtual Worlds

meditations.metavert.io
Share
Previous
Next
Comments
Top
New
Community

No posts

Ready for more?

© 2023 Metavert LLC
Privacy ∙ Terms ∙ Collection notice
Start WritingGet the app
Substack is the home for great writing